Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Packaging | Tata Steel NederlandPackaging | Tata Steel Nederland
VS
Avery DennisonAvery Dennison
Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland

Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland

Wenckebachstraat 1, Velsen-Noord, 1951, NL

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
743/1000Moderate

We make steel for packaging. Our specialist steels are designed for food and drinks cans, aerosols, paint tins, luxury packaging and more. By working in partnership with our technical teams, we can support you to deliver your packaging solutions to the market. Talk to u...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Mentor, Ohio, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://averydennison.com
776/1000Fair

We are a global materials science and digital identification solutions company with locations in over 50 countries, and approximately 35,000 employees worldwide. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that provide branding and information solutions that optimiz...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:21,695
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland

Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avery Dennison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland

Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland or Avery Dennison ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland or Avery Dennison ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland and Avery Dennison, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Packaging | Tata Steel Nederland and Avery Dennison, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48579
SUMMARY

Improper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48567
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure HorizonDB allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-47655
SUMMARY

Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Microsoft Graph allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-47644
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Copilot Chat (Microsoft Edge) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45497
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8