Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AlimentaciónAlimentación
VS
GreggsGreggs
Alimentación

Alimentación

Calle calafell, 1, Vilafranca del Penedes, 08720, ES

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://knauf-industries.es/totalpacksystem/
759/1000Fair

Creamos soluciones para: =================== 👉🏼Pescados, marisco y cefalópodos. 👉🏼Frutas y verduras. 👉🏼Carnes. 👉🏼Catering y platos preparados. 👉🏼Logística alimentaria. Soluciones exclusivas: ================ 🍒 Somos la única empresa del mercado que dis...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:104
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Greggs

Greggs

GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.greggs.co.uk
770/1000Fair

Greggs is a leading food-on-the-go retailer with over 2,400 shops nationwide and serving over six million customers a week. We stand for great tasting, freshly prepared food that our customers can trust, at affordable prices and aim to become the customers’ favourite ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:12,822
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alimentación

Alimentación

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Greggs

Greggs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alimentación in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greggs in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alimentación (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alimentación cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Greggs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greggs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alimentación

Alimentación

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Greggs

Greggs

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alimentación company and Greggs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alimentación and Greggs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alimentación and Greggs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alimentación or Greggs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alimentación or Greggs ?
Between Alimentación and Greggs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alimentación and Greggs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES