Comparison Overview

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

VS

E.ON

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

300 Lakeside Dr, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, incorporated in California in 1905, is one of the largest combination natural gas and electric utilities in the United States. Based in San Francisco, the company is a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. There are approximately 20,000 employees who carry out Pacific Gas and Electric Company's primary business—the transmission and delivery of energy. The company provides natural gas and electric service to approximately 15 million people throughout a 70,000-square-mile service area in northern and central California. Fast Facts * Service area stretches from Eureka in the north to Bakersfield in the south, and from the Pacific Ocean in the west to the Sierra Nevada in the east * 141,215 circuit miles of electric distribution lines and 18,616 circuit miles of interconnected transmission lines * 42,141 miles of natural gas distribution pipelines and 6,438 miles of transportation pipelines * 5.1 million electric customer accounts * 4.3 million natural gas customer accounts

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 22,587
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

E.ON

Brüsseler Platz 1, Essen, undefined, 45131, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The E.ON Group is one of Europe's largest operators of energy networks and energy infrastructure and a provider of innovative customer solutions for 50 million customers. Thus, we are decisively driving forward the energy transition in Europe and are committed to sustainability, climate protection, and the future of our planet.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 29,412
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificgasandelectric.jpeg
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-on.jpeg
E.ON
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
E.ON
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Gas and Electric Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.ON in 2025.

Incident History — Pacific Gas and Electric Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Gas and Electric Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — E.ON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.ON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificgasandelectric.jpeg
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2016
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Database Exposure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-on.jpeg
E.ON
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

E.ON company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pacific Gas and Electric Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas E.ON company has not reported any.

In the current year, E.ON company and Pacific Gas and Electric Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither E.ON company nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither E.ON company nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither E.ON company nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company company nor E.ON company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

E.ON company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pacific Gas and Electric Company company.

E.ON company employs more people globally than Pacific Gas and Electric Company company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company nor E.ON holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N