Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pacific SeafoodPacific Seafood
VS
Bimbo Bakeries USABimbo Bakeries USA
Pacific Seafood

Pacific Seafood

16797 SE 130th Ave., Clackamas, OR, US, 97015

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
640/1000Poor

Founded in 1941 by the Dulcich Family, Pacific Seafood is a family-owned and operated company dedicated to providing the healthiest protein on the planet. Pacific Seafood manages all parts of the supply chain from harvesting/fishing to processing, and distribution in or...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:1,439
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

355 Business Center Dr, Horsham, 19044, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
696/1000Weak

Have you ever started your morning with a Thomas’® English muffin or bagel? Or bitten into the perfect slice of Sara Lee® bread? Do you break open a fresh box of Entenmann’s® donuts at family gatherings? If so, you’re already a fan of Bimbo Bakeries USA – the powerhouse...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:11,889
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pacific Seafood

Pacific Seafood

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Seafood in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Bimbo Bakeries USA has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pacific Seafood (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Seafood cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bimbo Bakeries USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bimbo Bakeries USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pacific Seafood

Pacific Seafood

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAC4302543101625
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAC4092840101525
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORABIM1789187242
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WASORABIM1788805468
🔒 Incident : Breach
BIM709080525

FAQ

Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pacific Seafood company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pacific Seafood and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pacific Seafood and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pacific Seafood or Bimbo Bakeries USA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pacific Seafood or Bimbo Bakeries USA ?
Between Pacific Seafood and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pacific Seafood and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8