Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials CompanyPacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company
VS
Lockheed MartinLockheed Martin
Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company

Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company

7073 W. Willis Road, Chandler, AZ, US, 85226

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://psemc.com
727/1000Moderate

PacSci EMC provides pyrotechnic and energetic material devices and integrated systems that operate precisely the moment they are commanded – down to the millisecond. The safe and reliable operation of our products drives PacSci EMC from development, design and testing t...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:669
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 20817, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

The world relies on what we do. Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, with offices across the U.S. and around the globe, our team delivers solutions that strengthen national security, shape industries and push engineering and technology to new levels. We collaborate t...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:113,476
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company

Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Lockheed Martin has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lockheed Martin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockheed Martin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company

Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAC432072725
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOCULANOR1777876145
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC621092125

FAQ

Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company and Lockheed Martin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company and Lockheed Martin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company or Lockheed Martin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company or Lockheed Martin ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company and Lockheed Martin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company and Lockheed Martin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3