Comparison Overview
Pacific Partnerships

Pacific Partnerships
177 Pacific Highway, North Sydney, 2060, AU
Last Update: 17/02/2026
Pacific Partnerships is a leading infrastructure developer. We drive innovative collaboration across CIMIC Group's collective expertise to create, fund, own, deliver and operate sustainable infrastructure and energy asset solutions that unlock benefits for our communiti...

Kier Group
Cavendish Place, UK, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Pacific Partnerships







Kier Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pacific Partnerships in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.
Incident History - Pacific Partnerships (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pacific Partnerships cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Pacific Partnerships

Kier Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.