Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PACCAR IndiaPACCAR India
VS
BinanceBinance
PACCAR India

PACCAR India

501 & 502, 5th Floor, Amar Tech Park, Balewadi, Pune, Maharashtra, 411045, IN

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.paccar.com/
768/1000Fair

PACCAR India is a subsidiary of PACCAR Inc., a global technology leader in the design, manufacture, and customer support of premium light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks under the Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF nameplates. PACCAR also designs and manufactures advanced dies...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:158
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Binance

Binance

Everywhere, 0, OO

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.binance.com/
291/1000Critical

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicate...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,567
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PACCAR India

PACCAR India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Binance

Binance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PACCAR India in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Binance has 390.2% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - PACCAR India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PACCAR India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PACCAR India

PACCAR India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Binance

Binance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINDIRMER1790037002
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINMEX1787063171
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIR1786633007

FAQ

Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PACCAR India company and Binance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PACCAR India and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PACCAR India and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PACCAR India or Binance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PACCAR India or Binance ?
Between PACCAR India and Binance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PACCAR India and Binance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3