Comparison Overview

P92 Digital

VS

Facebook

P92 Digital

Fรผrdล‘ str. 2., Budapest, undefined, 1038, HU
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Welcome to P92 Digital, a Gloster Group Company, and leading web, mobile, and cloud software development firm with a global presence spanning Budapest, Hungary; Szeged, Hungary; London, UK; and Cebu, Philippines. Our innovative Team-as-a-Service program offers ready-made development teams to expedite the execution of your new projects or initiatives. As a proud subsidiary of the highly successful Gloster Group, a prominent Stock Market listed entity, we boast a rich legacy of 35 years serving major corporations across the UK, Germany, North America, and Eastern Europe. Specializing in mission-critical business applications within FinTech, RewardTech, Payments, Automotive, and Utilities sectors, we excel in developing mobile apps across popular platforms such as Flutter, Android, and iOS.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Facebook

None
Last Update: 2025-09-16 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. We want to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. To do that, we ask that you help create a safe and respectful online space. These community values encourage constructive conversations on this page: โ€ข Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. โ€ข Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. So please treat everybody with respect. โ€ข Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. โ€ข Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. โ€ข If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit http://www.facebookcareers.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 24,606
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/p92-it-solutions.jpeg
P92 Digital
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
P92 Digital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Facebook
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for P92 Digital in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Facebook has 108.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” P92 Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

P92 Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Facebook (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Facebook cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/p92-it-solutions.jpeg
P92 Digital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/facebook.jpeg
Facebook
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Facebook Security Alert, User-Executed Command via File Explorer, AI-Generated Image Payloads, PowerShell Script Embedding
Motivation: Data Theft, Credential Harvesting, Financial Gain (Potential Ransomware/Fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking Forum
Blog: Blog

FAQ

P92 Digital company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Facebook company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Facebook company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas P92 Digital company has not reported any.

In the current year, Facebook company has reported more cyber incidents than P92 Digital company.

Neither Facebook company nor P92 Digital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Facebook company has disclosed at least one data breach, while P92 Digital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Facebook company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while P92 Digital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither P92 Digital company nor Facebook company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither P92 Digital company nor Facebook company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Facebook company employs more people globally than P92 Digital company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X