Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PÅFYLLPÅFYLL
VS
American Red CrossAmerican Red Cross
PÅFYLL

PÅFYLL

Parkgata 3, Foajeen, Ålesund, Møre og Romsdal, NO, 6003

Last Update: 16/11/2025

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Påfyll gir fakta, populærvitskaplege aha-opplevingar, stoltheit og håp i løpet av 90-120 innsiktsfulle kveldsminutt på Parken kulturhus i Ålesund. Gjennom talkshowformatet får du formidling og diskusjon om eitt aktuelt tema. Du får nærkontakt med dei som kan temaet frå ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
American Red Cross

American Red Cross

430 17th St NW, Washington, 20006, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.redcross.org
763/1000Fair

The American Red Cross prevents and alleviates human suffering in the face of emergencies by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of donors. Each day, thousands of people – people just like you – provide compassionate care to those in need. Our networ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:33,242
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PÅFYLL

PÅFYLL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Red Cross

American Red Cross

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PÅFYLL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Red Cross in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PÅFYLL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PÅFYLL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Red Cross (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Red Cross cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PÅFYLL

PÅFYLL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
American Red Cross

American Red Cross

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AME15579222

FAQ

Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PÅFYLL company and American Red Cross company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PÅFYLL and American Red Cross, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PÅFYLL and American Red Cross, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PÅFYLL or American Red Cross ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PÅFYLL or American Red Cross ?
Between PÅFYLL and American Red Cross, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PÅFYLL and American Red Cross, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA