Comparison Overview
Oysho

Oysho
Camino de Tordera a Palafolls, s/n, Tordera, Barcelona, 08490, ES
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Oysho is an international sport and leisure brand committed to innovation, quality and sustainability. We offer a wide variety of technical collections designed to achieve maximum performance and comfort during sports practice. In addition, our free time collections ar...

Jumbo Supermarkten
Rijksweg 15, Veghel, 5462 CE, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Jumbo is een Brabants familiebedrijf met een rijke historie. Begonnen in 1921 als levensmiddelengroothandel heeft Jumbo een indrukwekkende groei doorgemaakt. Inmiddels is het de tweede supermarktketen van Nederland. Wekelijks verwelkomt Jumbo miljoenen klanten in meer d...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Oysho







Jumbo Supermarkten






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Oysho in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jumbo Supermarkten in 2026.
Incident History - Oysho (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Oysho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jumbo Supermarkten (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jumbo Supermarkten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Oysho

Jumbo Supermarkten
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.