Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OYO ChinaOYO China
VS
Rotana HotelsRotana Hotels
OYO China

OYO China

undefined, 上海, 上海, 200000, CN

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

OYO酒店,2017年登陆深圳,作为一家连锁酒店品牌企业,专注于打造优质旅居生活空间,解决经济型单体酒店碎片化发展的现状。目前OYO酒店已进驻全国170多个城市,签约酒店已经超过1700家,拥有超过86000多间客房,业务覆盖深圳、广州、杭州、成都等城市。OYO酒店力图为二三四五六线城市创造更多就业机会,帮助推动当地旅游业的发展。花更少,住更好,和我们一起住进未来吧

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rotana Hotels

Rotana Hotels

Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, AE, P.O. Box 95100

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rotana.com
799/1000Fair

Since inception, Rotana has grown to be the region’s largest hospitality management company, and a brand that is widely recognized and admired. Rotana currently manages a portfolio of over 100 properties throughout the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe and Türkiye o...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:12,851
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OYO China

OYO China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rotana Hotels

Rotana Hotels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYO China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rotana Hotels in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OYO China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYO China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rotana Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rotana Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OYO China

OYO China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rotana Hotels

Rotana Hotels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OYO China company and Rotana Hotels company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OYO China and Rotana Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OYO China and Rotana Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OYO China or Rotana Hotels ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OYO China or Rotana Hotels ?
Between OYO China and Rotana Hotels, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OYO China and Rotana Hotels, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9