Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OYO ChinaOYO China
VS
IHG Hotels & ResortsIHG Hotels & Resorts
OYO China

OYO China

undefined, 上海, 上海, 200000, CN

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

OYO酒店,2017年登陆深圳,作为一家连锁酒店品牌企业,专注于打造优质旅居生活空间,解决经济型单体酒店碎片化发展的现状。目前OYO酒店已进驻全国170多个城市,签约酒店已经超过1700家,拥有超过86000多间客房,业务覆盖深圳、广州、杭州、成都等城市。OYO酒店力图为二三四五六线城市创造更多就业机会,帮助推动当地旅游业的发展。花更少,住更好,和我们一起住进未来吧

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG Hotels & Resorts

Windsor Dials 1, Arthur Road, Windsor, Berkshire, GB, SL4 1RS

Last Update: 27/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ihgplc.com
797/1000Fair

IHG Hotels & Resorts [LON:IHG, NYSE:IHG (ADRs)] is a global hospitality company, with a purpose to provide True Hospitality for Good. With a family of 21 hotel brands and IHG One Rewards, one of the world's largest hotel loyalty programmes, IHG has over 7,000 open hote...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:19,227
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OYO China

OYO China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG Hotels & Resorts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYO China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IHG Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OYO China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYO China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IHG Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IHG Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OYO China

OYO China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG Hotels & Resorts

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IHG223521922
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IHG1056072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
IHG833072525

FAQ

Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OYO China company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OYO China and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OYO China and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OYO China or IHG Hotels & Resorts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OYO China or IHG Hotels & Resorts ?
Between OYO China and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OYO China and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA