Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OYO SpainOYO Spain
VS
Mandarin OrientalMandarin Oriental
OYO Spain

OYO Spain

Madrid, 28046, ES

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.oyorooms.com/es/
769/1000Fair

¡Hola! Somos OYO. ¡Encantados de conocerte! Somos una cadena de hoteles independientes y estamos transformando la industria hotelera en todo el mundo. Nuestra misión es ofrecer alojamientos de calidad y a un precio competitivo en cualquier destino. La estancia perfect...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mandarin Oriental

Mandarin Oriental

18 Westlands Road, Quarry Bay, ., HK

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group is the award-winning owner and operator of some of the world’s most luxurious hotels, resorts and residences. Having grown from its Asian roots into a global brand, the Group now operates 43 hotels, 12 residences and 23 exclusive homes in 2...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:13,845
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OYO Spain

OYO Spain

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mandarin Oriental

Mandarin Oriental

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYO Spain in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mandarin Oriental in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OYO Spain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYO Spain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mandarin Oriental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mandarin Oriental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OYO Spain

OYO Spain

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mandarin Oriental

Mandarin Oriental

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAN233072725

FAQ

Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OYO Spain company and Mandarin Oriental company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OYO Spain and Mandarin Oriental, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OYO Spain and Mandarin Oriental, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OYO Spain or Mandarin Oriental ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OYO Spain or Mandarin Oriental ?
Between OYO Spain and Mandarin Oriental, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OYO Spain and Mandarin Oriental, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3