Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OYAK Mining MetallurgyOYAK Mining Metallurgy
VS
Norsk HydroNorsk Hydro
OYAK Mining Metallurgy

OYAK Mining Metallurgy

Barbaros Mah. Ardıç Sok. No:6 34746 Ataşehir İstanbul, İstanbul, 34746, TR

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.erdemir.com.tr/
761/1000Fair

OYAK Maden Metalürji olarak çalışanlarımız, müşterilerimiz, tedarikçilerimiz ve hissedarlarımızla birlikte Türkiye’nin küresel demir çelik gücüyüz. Yaklaşık 12.000 çalışanımızla Türkiye’nin en çok istihdam yaratan kuruluşlarından biriyiz. Uluslararası kalite standartl...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:665
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Drammensveien 264, Oslo, Oslo, NO, 0283

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.hydro.com
658/1000Weak

Hydro is a leading industrial company that builds businesses and partnerships for a more sustainable future. We develop industries that matter to people and society. Since 1905, Hydro has turned natural resources into valuable products for people and businesses, creati...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:13,095
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OYAK Mining Metallurgy

OYAK Mining Metallurgy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYAK Mining Metallurgy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norsk Hydro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OYAK Mining Metallurgy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYAK Mining Metallurgy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Norsk Hydro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norsk Hydro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OYAK Mining Metallurgy

OYAK Mining Metallurgy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOR442050724
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR416051424
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR5602456091025

FAQ

Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OYAK Mining Metallurgy or Norsk Hydro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OYAK Mining Metallurgy or Norsk Hydro ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OYAK Mining Metallurgy and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1