Comparison Overview
OYAK İNŞAAT

OYAK İNŞAAT
Cevizli Mahallesi Tugay Yolu Caddesi No:10C/127 OYAK Dragos Plaza 34846 Maltepe İSTANBUL, None, Maltepe, İstanbul, TR, 34734
Last Update: 01/04/2026
27 Temmuz 1982 tarihinde %100 OYAK iştiraki olarak kurulmuştur. Kuruluş amacına paralel olarak Türkiye genelinde toplam 13.507 adet konut inşaatını tamamlayarak hak sahiplerine teslim etmiştir. Hastane inşaatlarında önemli bir bilgi birikimine sahip olup, Türkiye gene...

Tata Projects
14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, 400087, IN
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

OYAK İNŞAAT







Tata Projects






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for OYAK İNŞAAT in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2026.
Incident History - OYAK İNŞAAT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
OYAK İNŞAAT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

OYAK İNŞAAT

Tata Projects
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.