Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.
VS
HUB InternationalHUB International
OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.

OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.

Kemerburgaz Caddesi, Sarıyer, TR

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş., 2017 yılında OYAK YATIRIM’ın %100 iştiraki olarak kurulmuştur. Türkiye’nin önde gelen sigorta şirketleriyle iş birliği yaparak OYAK Grubu şirketlerinin tüm sigorta ve reasürans ihtiyaçlarını yönetmekte, aynı zamanda grup d...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:71
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HUB International

HUB International

300 North LaSalle, 17th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60654

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Hi, we’re HUB. We advise businesses and individuals on how to reach their goals. When you partner with us, you’re at the center of a vast network of risk, insurance, employee benefits, retirement and wealth management specialists that bring clarity to a changing world ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:16,164
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.

OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HUB International

HUB International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HUB International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HUB International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HUB International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.

OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HUB International

HUB International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HUB752072525

FAQ

Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. company and HUB International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. and HUB International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. and HUB International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. or HUB International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. or HUB International ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. and HUB International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OYAK GRUP SİGORTA ve Reasürans Brokerliği A.Ş. and HUB International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2