Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OYAK ANKER Bank GmbHOYAK ANKER Bank GmbH
VS
BNP Paribas FortisBNP Paribas Fortis
OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH

OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH

Lyoner Straße 9, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, DE

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oyakankerbank.de
752/1000Fair

Unser Leitbild: innovativ und kundenorientiert DIGITAL. INNOVATIV. ROBUST – So lautet der Slogan der OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH. Er spiegelt unser Selbstverständnis als modernes und innovatives Unternehmen wider, welches seinen Platz mitten in der Gesellschaft hat. Banking i...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:56
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

Rue Montagne du Parc 3, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

For over 200 years, BNP Paribas Fortis has helped drive the growth and prosperity of Belgium’s economy and communities. The mission of our 12,000 colleagues is clear: be the trusted financial partner for four million individual customers, businesses and organisations. W...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:12,028
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH

OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Fortis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BNP Paribas Fortis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas Fortis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH

OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH or BNP Paribas Fortis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH or BNP Paribas Fortis ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OYAK ANKER Bank GmbH and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2