Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
ownCloud - A Kiteworks Company

ownCloud - A Kiteworks Company Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

owncloud.com

ownCloud, a Kiteworks company, develops and provides open-source software for content collaboration, allowing teams to easily share and work on files seamlessly regardless of device or location. More than 200 million users worldwide use ownCloud as an alternative to public clouds, empowering them to improve digital sovereignty, security, and data protection. ownCloud was acquired by Kiteworks in November 2023. Kiteworks (www.kiteworks.com) unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content communications using content-defined zero trust in Kiteworks-enabled Private Content Networks. Kiteworks is the only security platform authorized by FedRAMP that provides support for file sharing, managed file transfer, and email data


OKC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

OKC
Company Information
Website:http://www.owncloud.com
Employees number:36
Number of followers:6,420
NAICS:
Industry Type:Information Technology & Services
Homepage:owncloud.com
OKC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
OKCInformation Technology & Services
Updated:
04/04/2026
753/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
✖ Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
OKC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
OKCInformation Technology & Services
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

OKCFair
Current Score
753Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-19 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
OCTOBER 2026
735Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2026
734Before Incident
AUGUST 2026
753Before Incident
Cyber Attack
13 Aug 2026 • OKC
Philippine nuclear research agency and Marine engineering firm linked to the Philippine Navy: Hackers Exploit ownCloud and WordPress Flaws to Steal Philippine Nuclear and Naval Data

Chinese-Speaking Hackers Exploit ownCloud and WordPress Flaws to Target Philippine Nuclear and Naval Entities

734After Incident
CRITICAL-19
ARIPHI1787841291
Chinese-Speaking Hackers Exploit ownCloud and WordPress Flaws to Target Philippine Nuclear and Naval Entities A suspected Chinese-speaking threat actor exploited unpatched vulnerabilities in ownCloud and WordPress to steal sensitive data from a Philippine nuclear research agency and a marine engineering firm linked to the Philippine Navy. The campaign, uncovered by Hunt.io on August 13, highlights the risks of exposed internet-facing systems in organizations handling national-security data. ### Attack Details The intrusions leveraged two critical flaws: 1. ownCloud (CVE-2023-49105) – An authentication bypass in the platform’s pre-signed link feature allowed attackers to access files via WebDAV requests without credentials. The nuclear agency’s self-hosted ownCloud instance was compromised using five custom Python scripts, which systematically downloaded files while evading detection with randomized delays. - Stolen data included: - Reactor core component databases - Fuel inventory and radiation-safety records - Staff resumes, travel logs, and financial disclosures - Encrypted credential stores (KeePass, AxCrypt) and a BitLocker recovery key - Files were organized in simplified Chinese-labeled folders, suggesting the operator’s linguistic background. 2. WordPress (CVE-2024-28000) – The marine engineering firm’s site was breached via a flaw in the LiteSpeed Cache plugin (versions <6.4), enabling attackers to create a rogue administrator account through the REST API. The exploit ran for nearly 4 hours before succeeding. - Stolen data included: - Full WordPress installation (195 MB) - Database dump and media library - Successful admin credentials (obtained via XML-RPC brute-forcing) - The site was also found hosting an unrelated EtherHiding-style malware (fake verification pages delivering VBS droppers), though no direct link to this campaign was established. ### Scope and Impact - Nuclear agency: ~9 GB of data was exfiltrated, though only 372 MB (176 files) were recovered from the exposed staging server. - Marine engineering firm: Attackers archived the entire WordPress site, including password hashes, plugin settings, and site secrets, granting persistent access. - Attribution: Hunt.io identified Chinese-language artifacts but did not attribute the activity to a known group. ### Technical Indicators The exposed server (31.58.209[.]241:8000) contained attack tools, transfer logs, and stolen files. Additional IoCs include: - Stage-one ELF loader: `multi_backupd` (SHA-256: `7447d0d0c34779d4c519823b39bf6ddc16d2b34a226b82ee69da6f5b4a77ad82`) - Stage-two payload: `stage2_payload.bin` (SHA-256: `10df3451915ea35bcb17efe121415f24182680e2d07fc09df07ee695072104c1`) - EtherHiding artifacts: Fake verification domains (`fine-work-team[.]com`, `timelevel12[.]com`) and an Ethereum smart contract (`0x58460d0b3d4d6b03761c89120393c0c676676496`). The incident underscores the need for timely patching, credential hygiene, and monitoring of WebDAV and REST API activity in critical infrastructure.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachEspionage
MOTIVATION
Espionage, Data Theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: ~9 GB (nuclear agency), 195 MB (marine engineering firm)ownCloud instanceWordPress siteOperational Impact: Potential compromise of national-security dataBrand Reputation Impact: HighIdentity Theft Risk: High (staff resumes, travel logs, financial disclosures)
DATA BREACH
Reactor core component databasesFuel inventory and radiation-safety recordsStaff resumes, travel logs, and financial disclosuresEncrypted credential stores (KeePass, AxCrypt)BitLocker recovery keyWordPress database dumpMedia libraryAdmin credentialsSensitivity Of Data: High (national-security, personally identifiable information)Data Encryption: Partial (KeePass, AxCrypt, BitLocker)DatabasesDocumentsCredentialsMedia files
JULY 2026
753Before Incident
JUNE 2026
753Before Incident
MAY 2026
753Before Incident
APRIL 2026
753Before Incident
MARCH 2026
753Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
753Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
753Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
753Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for OKC ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on OKC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with OKC ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view OKC's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?