Comparison Overview
Owens Corning Roofing

Owens Corning Roofing
1 Owens Corning Parkawy, Toledo, 43659, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Owens Corning is more than just a trusted name, we are a market leader in roofing shingles, underlayment and components products. We are committed to continuously pursuing product innovations that give roofing contractors the cutting edge. Follow us for updates on our...

Knauf
Am Bahnhof 7, Iphofen, D-97346, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Everyone sees opportunity differently. Knauf sees opportunity in everyone. Similar to other global businesses, our 41,500 team members in 90 countries across 300 sites provide a huge opportunity for anyone with ambition and energy. Unlike other global businesses, you ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Owens Corning Roofing







Knauf






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Owens Corning Roofing in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Knauf in 2026.
Incident History - Owens Corning Roofing (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Owens Corning Roofing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Knauf (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Knauf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Owens Corning Roofing

Knauf
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.