Comparison Overview
Engineering Project Services

Engineering Project Services
2 Westbrook Corporate Center, 300, Westchester, Illinois, US, 60154
Last Update: 11/05/2026
Sterling is an award-winning professional outsourced engineering and workforce solutions company. We provide client-focused specialty solutions across multiple industries, including automation, food and beverage, life sciences, manufacturing, and utilities. Since 1969, ...

ST Engineering
ST Engineering Hub, Singapore, 567710, SG
Last Update: 11/09/2026
At ST Engineering, we apply our technology and innovation to solve real-world problems and improve lives. Our commitment to excellence and our track record as a global technology, defence, and engineering company earns us a reputation for quality and trust. Subsc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Engineering Project Services







ST Engineering






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Engineering Project Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ST Engineering in 2026.
Incident History - Engineering Project Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Engineering Project Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ST Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ST Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Engineering Project Services

ST Engineering
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.