Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Engineering Project ServicesEngineering Project Services
VS
AtkinsRéalisAtkinsRéalis
Engineering Project Services

Engineering Project Services

2 Westbrook Corporate Center, 300, Westchester, Illinois, US, 60154

Last Update: 11/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.sterling-engineering.com
752/1000Fair

Sterling is an award-winning professional outsourced engineering and workforce solutions company. We provide client-focused specialty solutions across multiple industries, including automation, food and beverage, life sciences, manufacturing, and utilities. Since 1969, ...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AtkinsRéalis

AtkinsRéalis

455 René-Lévesque Blvd W, Montreal, H2Z 1Z3, CA

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.atkinsrealis.com
779/1000Fair

We are a world-class engineering services and nuclear organization. We connect people, data and technology to transform the world’s infrastructure and energy systems. Together, with our industry partners and clients, and our global team of consultants, designers, ...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:46,483
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Engineering Project Services

Engineering Project Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AtkinsRéalis

AtkinsRéalis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineering Project Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AtkinsRéalis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Engineering Project Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineering Project Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AtkinsRéalis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AtkinsRéalis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Engineering Project Services

Engineering Project Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AtkinsRéalis

AtkinsRéalis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Engineering Project Services company and AtkinsRéalis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Engineering Project Services and AtkinsRéalis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Engineering Project Services and AtkinsRéalis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Engineering Project Services or AtkinsRéalis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Engineering Project Services or AtkinsRéalis ?
Between Engineering Project Services and AtkinsRéalis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Engineering Project Services and AtkinsRéalis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3