Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient ImagingAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging
VS
Aster DM HealthcareAster DM Healthcare
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging

265 Executive Park Blvd, Winston-Salem, 27103, US

Last Update: 27/12/2025

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging has been a trusted provider for medical imaging throughout Winston-Salem and its surrounding communities for many years. Our partnership with the expert radiologists of Wake Forest Baptist Health allows us to bring the highest qua...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:26
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aster DM Healthcare

Aster DM Healthcare

AE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 400+ medical establishments, including 15 hospitals, 120 clinics and 307 pharmacies in GCC and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthc...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:18,904
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aster DM Healthcare

Aster DM Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aster DM Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aster DM Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aster DM Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aster DM Healthcare

Aster DM Healthcare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging and Aster DM Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging and Aster DM Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging or Aster DM Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging or Aster DM Healthcare ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging and Aster DM Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Outpatient Imaging and Aster DM Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA