Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OttoKitOttoKit
VS
BinanceBinance
OttoKit

OttoKit

Brainstorm Force US LLC, Wilmington, 19801 , US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://ottokit.com/
749/1000Moderate

OttoKit | Automate Anything. No Code. Powered by AI. OttoKit is a modern automation platform that helps individuals, teams, and businesses save time by automating repetitive tasks—without writing code. With a simple drag-and-drop builder and built-in AI features, anyo...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Binance

Binance

Everywhere, 0, OO

Last Update: 18/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.binance.com/
374/1000Critical

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicate...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,567
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OttoKit

OttoKit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Binance

Binance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OttoKit in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Binance has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - OttoKit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OttoKit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OttoKit

OttoKit

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
OTT814041125
Binance

Binance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINMEX1787063171
🔒 Incident : Breach
NETFACTIKBINONLMICAPPCONGOV1769182444
🔒 Incident : Breach
YAHFACTIKNETMICONLBINCAN1769189638

FAQ

Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OttoKit company and Binance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OttoKit and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OttoKit and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OttoKit or Binance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OttoKit or Binance ?
Between OttoKit and Binance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OttoKit and Binance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA