Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OTP banka HrvatskaOTP banka Hrvatska
VS
NatWest GroupNatWest Group
OTP banka Hrvatska

OTP banka Hrvatska

Domovinskog rata 61, Split, Croatia, HR, 21000

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.otpbanka.hr
758/1000Fair

U OTP banci želimo pokazati da može i drugačije. Naša svrha je da kao zelena, napredna i digitalna organizacija podržavamo svoje klijente konkurentnim i kvalitetnim financijskim proizvodima te omogućavamo ostvarenje njihovih životnih i poslovnih planova. Inovativna smo ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:1,064
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NatWest Group

NatWest Group

175 Glasgow Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, GB, EH12 9BH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
816/1000Good

We’re the bank that turns possibilities into progress. We understand our customers, their worlds, and what matters to them. We help them see the opportunities and navigate a rapidly changing world. And we’re simplifying our business so that we can anticipate our custom...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:43,784
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OTP banka Hrvatska

OTP banka Hrvatska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NatWest Group

NatWest Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OTP banka Hrvatska in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NatWest Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OTP banka Hrvatska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OTP banka Hrvatska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NatWest Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NatWest Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OTP banka Hrvatska

OTP banka Hrvatska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NatWest Group

NatWest Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska company and NatWest Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska and NatWest Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska and NatWest Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OTP banka Hrvatska or NatWest Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OTP banka Hrvatska or NatWest Group ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska and NatWest Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OTP banka Hrvatska and NatWest Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8