Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Otokoç OtomotivOtokoç Otomotiv
VS
BelkBelk
Otokoç Otomotiv

Otokoç Otomotiv

Aydınevler Mah. Saygı Cad. No:60/1, İstanbul, Küçükyalı, 34854, TR

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Koç Topluluğu’nun kurucusu merhum Vehbi Koç tarafından, 1928 yılında Ankara’da “Ford Motor Company” acenteliğinin alınmasıyla kurulan Koç Holding’in ilk otomotiv sektörü yatırımı olan Otokoç Otomotiv’in temelleri atılmıştır. Otomotivle ilgili tüm çözümleri tek çatı alt...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,362
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Belk

Belk

2801 W Tyvola Rd, Charlotte, 28217, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.belkcareers.com/
677/1000Weak

Charlotte-based Belk, Inc., a privately-owned department store, began when William Henry Belk opened his first store in 1888 with his brother, Dr. John Belk, joining as a partner. What started as two brothers in business has now grown into a legacy of selling great prod...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,732
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Otokoç Otomotiv

Otokoç Otomotiv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Belk

Belk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Otokoç Otomotiv in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Otokoç Otomotiv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Otokoç Otomotiv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Belk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Otokoç Otomotiv

Otokoç Otomotiv

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Belk

Belk

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BELMAR1770616665

FAQ

Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv company and Belk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv and Belk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv and Belk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Otokoç Otomotiv or Belk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Otokoç Otomotiv or Belk ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv and Belk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Otokoç Otomotiv and Belk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1