Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.
VS
ContinentalContinental
OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.

OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.

Atatürk Caddesi No:6 , Sakarya, undefined, 54580, TR

Last Update: 24/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.otokar.com.tr
762/1000Fair

Koç Topluluğu şirketlerinden Otokar, 1963'ten bu yana kendi teknoloji, tasarım ve uygulamaları ile müşterilerinin ihtiyaçlarına uygun özel çözümler sunuyor. Sakarya’daki 552.000 m²’lik alana kurulu fabrikasında 4000’den fazla çalışanıyla faaliyet gösteriyor.   Otokar, ...

NAICS:336
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,039
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Continental

Continental

Continental-Plaza 1, Hannover, Lower Saxony, DE, 30175

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
447/1000Critical

Continental develops pioneering technologies and services for sustainable and connected mobility of people and their goods. Founded in 1871, the technology company offers safe, efficient, intelligent and affordable solutions for vehicles, machines, traffic and transport...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:68,795
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.

OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Continental

Continental

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Continental has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Continental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Continental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.

OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Continental

Continental

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CON1768059238
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FRACONBLA1766997330
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CON2135181122

FAQ

Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. company and Continental company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. and Continental, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. and Continental, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. or Continental ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. or Continental ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. and Continental, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OTOKAR Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi A.Ş. and Continental, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3