Comparison Overview
Otohub Srl

Otohub Srl
Via San Tommaso d'Aquino, 15, Naples, Campania, 80133, IT
Last Update: 21/02/2026
Otohub, now part of Amplifon SpA, was formed by biomedical engineers with an innovative vision for Audiology of the future. Mobile devices will constitute the principal mode of delivering hearing healthcare due to their portability, multimedia functionalities, internet ...

Edwards Lifesciences
One Edwards Way, Irvine, 92614, US
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE: EW), is the leading global structural heart innovation company, driven by a passion to improve patient lives. Through breakthrough technologies, world-class evidence and partnerships with clinicians and healthcare stakeholders, our employees ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Otohub Srl







Edwards Lifesciences






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Otohub Srl in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edwards Lifesciences in 2026.
Incident History - Otohub Srl (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Otohub Srl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Edwards Lifesciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edwards Lifesciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Otohub Srl

Edwards Lifesciences
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.