Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Osuuskauppa HämeenmaaOsuuskauppa Hämeenmaa
VS
Pilot Flying JPilot Flying J
Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa

Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa

Apilakatu, None, Lahti, Southern Finland, FI, 15610

Last Update: 03/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hameenmaa.fi
771/1000Fair

Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa toimii 21 kunnan alueella Kanta- ja Päijät-Hämeessä. Hämeenmaan liiketoiminta-alueita ovat market-, rauta-, tavaratalo-, erikoisliike-, auto-, liikennemyymälä- ja polttoneste- sekä majoitus- ja ravitsemiskauppa. Osuuskauppa on myynniltään alueensa ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:382
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pilot Flying J

Pilot Flying J

5508 Lonas Rd., Knoxville, 37909, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://pilotflyingj.com/
788/1000Fair

Company Overview Headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, Pilot Flying J is the largest operator of travel centers in North America with more than 750 locations throughout the United States and Canada and employs more than 24,000 Team Members. Pilot Flying J services over...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,899
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa

Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pilot Flying J

Pilot Flying J

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilot Flying J in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pilot Flying J (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilot Flying J cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa

Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pilot Flying J

Pilot Flying J

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa company and Pilot Flying J company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa and Pilot Flying J, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa and Pilot Flying J, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa or Pilot Flying J ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa or Pilot Flying J ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa and Pilot Flying J, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Osuuskauppa Hämeenmaa and Pilot Flying J, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2