Comparison Overview

Oslo Museum

VS

Chiltern Open Air Museum

Oslo Museum

Frognerveien 67, Oslo, 0257, NO
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://oslomuseum.no

Stiftelsen Oslo Museum er byens eget museum, og bidrar til kunnskap om og forankring i Oslo-samfunnet. Museet forvalter, formidler og forsker i Oslos historie, teaterhistorie og nyere innvandringshistorie. Museet har en aktiv formidlingsprofil og tilhold på flere steder i Oslo; Bymuseet og Teatermuseet i Frognerparken, Interkulturelt Museum på Grønland og Arbeidermuseet på Sagene. Oslo Museum ble i 2019 kåret til «Årets museum» av Norges Museumsforbund, med begrunnelse i museets mangfoldsprofil og nyskapende formidlings- og utstillingsarbeid. Museet forvalter en av landets største fotosamlinger, har en stor samling av malerier og Oslo-portretter, og en kulturhistorisk samling som også inkluderer intervjumateriale.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chiltern Open Air Museum

Newland Park, Gorelands Lane, Chalfont St Giles, England, HP8 4AB, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coam.org.uk

Chiltern Open Air Museum was founded in 1976 with the aim of rescuing threatened buildings. More than thirty historic building have now been saved and rebuilt at the site, and there are more in store. The Museum only accepts buildings that would otherwise be demolished. The Museum’s collection focuses on vernacular buildings – the past houses and workplaces of ordinary people that are gradually disappearing from the landscape. In the Chilterns, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty on London’s doorstep, the pressures of redevelopment are particularly great. Chiltern Open Air Museum preserves a heritage that would otherwise have been lost. The Museum is a registered charity and receives no regular grants towards its running costs or capital projects. We are grateful for the fantastic support of over 200 volunteers and the Friends of the Museum Association.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oslo Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chiltern Open Air Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oslo Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chiltern Open Air Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Oslo Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oslo Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chiltern Open Air Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chiltern Open Air Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Oslo Museum company and Chiltern Open Air Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Chiltern Open Air Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oslo Museum company.

In the current year, Chiltern Open Air Museum company and Oslo Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oslo Museum company employs more people globally than Chiltern Open Air Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References