Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OSF OnCall Digital HealthOSF OnCall Digital Health
VS
Centene CorporationCentene Corporation
OSF OnCall Digital Health

OSF OnCall Digital Health

Peoria, 61604, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

OSF OnCall is an entity within OSF HealthCare leveraging tools, technology and decades of experience to transform today's health care landscape. This virtual 'hospital without walls' platform provides 24/7 access with offerings for partners and patients across the entir...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation

7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Saint Louis, 63105, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centene.com
792/1000Fair

Centene Corporation is a leading healthcare enterprise committed to helping people live healthier lives. Centene offers affordable and high-quality products to more than 1 in 15 individuals across the nation, including Medicaid and Medicare members (including Medicare P...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:34,905
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OSF OnCall Digital Health

OSF OnCall Digital Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OSF OnCall Digital Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centene Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OSF OnCall Digital Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OSF OnCall Digital Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Centene Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centene Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OSF OnCall Digital Health

OSF OnCall Digital Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEN18136522

FAQ

Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health company and Centene Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health and Centene Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health and Centene Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OSF OnCall Digital Health or Centene Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OSF OnCall Digital Health or Centene Corporation ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health and Centene Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OSF OnCall Digital Health and Centene Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA