Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Orrcon Steel DistributionOrrcon Steel Distribution
VS
Lowe's Companies, Inc.Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Orrcon Steel Distribution

Orrcon Steel Distribution

920 Nudgee Rd, Northgate, 4013, AU

Last Update: 21/12/2025

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Orrcon Steel Distribution is a leading distributor of steel tube and pipe. Our extensive product range covers RHS, SHS & CHS structural tubular steel, hot rolled structural steel and a variety of fencing, roofing and building accessories. We supply to a diverse customer...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:244
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Lowe's Companies, Inc.

1000 Lowes Blvd, Mooresville, 28117, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://talent.lowes.com
807/1000Good

Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 50 home improvement company serving approximately 20 million customers a week in the United States. Lowe’s and its related businesses operate or service more than 2,200 home improvement and hardware stores and employ over...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:107,016
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Orrcon Steel Distribution

Orrcon Steel Distribution

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Lowe's Companies, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orrcon Steel Distribution in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lowe's Companies, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Orrcon Steel Distribution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orrcon Steel Distribution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lowe's Companies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lowe's Companies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Orrcon Steel Distribution

Orrcon Steel Distribution

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOW144072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOW027072725

FAQ

Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution company and Lowe's Companies, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution and Lowe's Companies, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution and Lowe's Companies, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Orrcon Steel Distribution or Lowe's Companies, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Orrcon Steel Distribution or Lowe's Companies, Inc. ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution and Lowe's Companies, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Orrcon Steel Distribution and Lowe's Companies, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2