Comparison Overview

Orpheo

VS

Chiltern Open Air Museum

Orpheo

6, Rue Paul-Valérien Perrin, Seyssinet-Pariset, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, FR, 38170
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://orpheogroup.com/

We design and manufacture word-class audio guides and information systems for museums and cultural sites. For 30 years, Orpheo has worked diligently to provide complete audio and multimedia guide solutions all around the world. Over 300,000 of our audio guides and other devices are currently installed in more than 2,000 sites worldwide. We do not outsource our production, everything is made in-house. This is just one of our methods to ensure exceptional quality and customer service. Thanks to our brilliant content creation team and extensive product offerings, we are ready and excited to create a custom tour for your unique site.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chiltern Open Air Museum

Newland Park, Gorelands Lane, Chalfont St Giles, England, HP8 4AB, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coam.org.uk

Chiltern Open Air Museum was founded in 1976 with the aim of rescuing threatened buildings. More than thirty historic building have now been saved and rebuilt at the site, and there are more in store. The Museum only accepts buildings that would otherwise be demolished. The Museum’s collection focuses on vernacular buildings – the past houses and workplaces of ordinary people that are gradually disappearing from the landscape. In the Chilterns, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty on London’s doorstep, the pressures of redevelopment are particularly great. Chiltern Open Air Museum preserves a heritage that would otherwise have been lost. The Museum is a registered charity and receives no regular grants towards its running costs or capital projects. We are grateful for the fantastic support of over 200 volunteers and the Friends of the Museum Association.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orpheo-group.jpeg
Orpheo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orpheo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chiltern Open Air Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orpheo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chiltern Open Air Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Orpheo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orpheo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chiltern Open Air Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chiltern Open Air Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orpheo-group.jpeg
Orpheo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Orpheo company and Chiltern Open Air Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Chiltern Open Air Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Orpheo company.

In the current year, Chiltern Open Air Museum company and Orpheo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Orpheo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Orpheo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Orpheo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orpheo company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Orpheo company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Orpheo company employs more people globally than Chiltern Open Air Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orpheo nor Chiltern Open Air Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References