Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Orkla LatvijaOrkla Latvija
VS
Grupo BimboGrupo Bimbo
Orkla Latvija

Orkla Latvija

Miera iela 22, Rīga, Rīga, LV-1001, LV

Last Update: 30/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://orkla.lv/
762/1000Fair

“Orkla Latvija” is the leading producer and supplier of fast-moving consumer goods in the Baltic states. We unite and develop popular local brands “Laima”, “Selga”, “Staburadze”, “Ādažu Čipsi”, “Spilva” and “Gutta”, among others, in the production process of our product...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

MX

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://grupobimbo.com
797/1000Fair

Grupo Bimbo es la empresa líder en panificación y un jugador relevante en snacks. Hornea +9,000 productos, distribuyéndolos a través de +3.5 millones de puntos de venta con +54,000 rutas. Grupo Bimbo tiene +153,000 colaboradores, +1,500 centros de ventas estratégicame...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:49,573
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Orkla Latvija

Orkla Latvija

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orkla Latvija in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Grupo Bimbo has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Orkla Latvija (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orkla Latvija cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Bimbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bimbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Orkla Latvija

Orkla Latvija

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FLOREL1788971139

FAQ

Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Orkla Latvija company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Orkla Latvija and Grupo Bimbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Orkla Latvija and Grupo Bimbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Orkla Latvija or Grupo Bimbo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Orkla Latvija or Grupo Bimbo ?
Between Orkla Latvija and Grupo Bimbo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Orkla Latvija and Grupo Bimbo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9