Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Orkla SnacksOrkla Snacks
VS
Bimbo Bakeries USABimbo Bakeries USA
Orkla Snacks

Orkla Snacks

Drammensveien 149, Oslo, undefined, 0277, NO

Last Update: 29/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.orklasnacks.com
747/1000Moderate

Orkla Snacks is a market leader within confectionery, biscuits and salty snacks in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Our portfolio consists of strong, local heritage brands that have been part of consumers life through generations, such as Smash!, BUBS, Nidar, OLW, KiM...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:71
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

355 Business Center Dr, Horsham, 19044, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
696/1000Weak

Have you ever started your morning with a Thomas’® English muffin or bagel? Or bitten into the perfect slice of Sara Lee® bread? Do you break open a fresh box of Entenmann’s® donuts at family gatherings? If so, you’re already a fan of Bimbo Bakeries USA – the powerhouse...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:11,889
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Orkla Snacks

Orkla Snacks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orkla Snacks in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Bimbo Bakeries USA has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Orkla Snacks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orkla Snacks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bimbo Bakeries USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bimbo Bakeries USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Orkla Snacks

Orkla Snacks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORABIM1789187242
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WASORABIM1788805468
🔒 Incident : Breach
BIM709080525

FAQ

Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Orkla Snacks company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Orkla Snacks and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Orkla Snacks and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Orkla Snacks or Bimbo Bakeries USA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Orkla Snacks or Bimbo Bakeries USA ?
Between Orkla Snacks and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Orkla Snacks and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA