Comparison Overview
Orkla ASA

Orkla ASA
Drammensveien 149, Oslo, 0277, NO
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Orkla ASA is a leading industrial investment company. Its scope of activity is brands and consumer-oriented companies. At present, Orkla has 10 portfolio companies creating sustainable value through active ownership of brands and consumer investment companies. Orkla i...

Sonae
Maia, Porto, 4470-177, PT
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Sonae exists to create a lasting positive impact on businesses, people, communities and on the planet. Managing a diverse portfolio of businesses in retail, financial services, technology, investments, real estate and telecommunications, Sonae makes the most of its ex...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Orkla ASA







Sonae






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Orkla ASA in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sonae in 2026.
Incident History - Orkla ASA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Orkla ASA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sonae (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sonae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Orkla ASA

Sonae
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.