Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Orkla EestiOrkla Eesti
VS
Restaurant AssociatesRestaurant Associates
Orkla Eesti

Orkla Eesti

Põrguvälja tee 6, Lehmja, Harjumaa, 75306, EE

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://orkla.ee/
755/1000Fair

Through its two Estonian production units, the Kalev factory in Jüri and the Põltsamaa factory in Jõgeva County, Orkla Eesti produces over 500 different products. Kalev sweets and chocolates and Põltsamaa juices, mustard, vegetable preserves and Felix ketchup have been ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:92
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Restaurant Associates

Restaurant Associates

132 W 31st Street, Suite 601, New York, New York, US, 10001

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Restaurant Associates is a chef-driven hospitality company known for elevating culinary and brand experiences for our clients and guests across the country. Our lines of business include restaurants, workplace, higher education, cultural centers, and event catering. ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,314
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Orkla Eesti

Orkla Eesti

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Restaurant Associates

Restaurant Associates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orkla Eesti in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Restaurant Associates in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Orkla Eesti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orkla Eesti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Restaurant Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restaurant Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Orkla Eesti

Orkla Eesti

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Restaurant Associates

Restaurant Associates

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Orkla Eesti company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Orkla Eesti and Restaurant Associates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Orkla Eesti and Restaurant Associates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Orkla Eesti or Restaurant Associates ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Orkla Eesti or Restaurant Associates ?
Between Orkla Eesti and Restaurant Associates, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Orkla Eesti and Restaurant Associates, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2