Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Oriflame CosmeticsOriflame Cosmetics
VS
AvonAvon
Oriflame Cosmetics

Oriflame Cosmetics

Oriflame Holding AG, Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, CH-8200, CH

Last Update: 16/02/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

We're a people-powered wellbeing and beauty community with an entrepreneurial spirit – a supportive cheer squad ready to empower your journey with the beauty of your wellbeing. Together, we'll help you carve out your unique path to wellbeing – so you can enjoy the ride.

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:27,546
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avon

Avon

Nunn Mills Road, Northampton, GB, NN1 5PA

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.avonworldwide.com
810/1000Good

Think you know Avon? Think again. We’ve been doing beauty differently for 135 years. Pioneering in listening to women’s needs and speaking out for them. Standing for what matters to them. Supporting their endeavours. We’re a company that connects people through bea...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:74,159
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Oriflame Cosmetics

Oriflame Cosmetics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avon

Avon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oriflame Cosmetics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Oriflame Cosmetics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oriflame Cosmetics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Oriflame Cosmetics

Oriflame Cosmetics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avon

Avon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AVO2354123

FAQ

Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics company and Avon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics and Avon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics and Avon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Oriflame Cosmetics or Avon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Oriflame Cosmetics or Avon ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics and Avon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Oriflame Cosmetics and Avon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA