Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.
VS
Prudential plcPrudential plc
ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

Balkan Caddesi, Casper Plaza, İstanbul, None, TR, None

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.orfin.com.tr/
753/1000Fair

OYAK and RENAULT companies established Orfin Finansman A.Ş. in 2011 to carry their 40 years of production and distribution experience in the automotive industry into the financial services field. ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.'s main field of activity is vehicle loans; - Commerc...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prudential plc

Prudential plc

13/F, One International Finance Centre, 1 Habour View Street, Central, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

We are Prudential. For Every Life, For Every Future. Prudential provides life and health insurance and asset management in Greater China, ASEAN, India and Africa. Prudential’s mission is to be the most trusted partner and protector for this generation and generations ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:55,792
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prudential plc

Prudential plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prudential plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prudential plc

Prudential plc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and Prudential plc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and Prudential plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and Prudential plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. or Prudential plc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. or Prudential plc ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and Prudential plc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and Prudential plc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA