Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.
VS
PING ANPING AN
ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

Balkan Caddesi, Casper Plaza, İstanbul, None, TR, None

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.orfin.com.tr/
753/1000Fair

OYAK and RENAULT companies established Orfin Finansman A.Ş. in 2011 to carry their 40 years of production and distribution experience in the automotive industry into the financial services field. ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.'s main field of activity is vehicle loans; - Commerc...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PING AN

PING AN

No. 5033 Yitian Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518046, CN

Last Update: 27/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://group.pingan.com/
830/1000Good

This is the official Company Page of Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (HKEx: 2318; SSE: 601318; ADR: PNGAY). Ping An strives to become a world leading technology-powered financial services group. We believe the way people receive financial services an...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:51,286
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PING AN

PING AN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PING AN in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PING AN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PING AN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

ORFİN Finansman A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PING AN

PING AN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. company and PING AN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. or PING AN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. or PING AN ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and PING AN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ORFİN Finansman A.Ş. and PING AN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5