Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Government Ethics Commission
VS
Queensland GovernmentQueensland Government
Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Oregon Government Ethics Commission

3218 Pringle Rd SE, #220, Salem, 97302-1680, US

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

The Oregon Government Ethics Commission (OGEC) will impartially and effectively administer and enforce Oregon's Government Ethics Laws for the benefit of Oregon's citizens. The Commission will emphasize education in achieving its mission. The OGEC was established by v...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Queensland Government

Queensland Government

1 William Street, Brisbane, 4000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.qld.gov.au
798/1000Fair

ABOUT US We are the largest and most diverse organisation in our state. We have more than 90 government departments and organisations delivering for Queensland across 4000+ locations, from the Torres Strait to the Gold Coast; Mount Isa to Brisbane. This page is monitore...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:84,670
Subsidiaries:62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Oregon Government Ethics Commission

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Queensland Government

Queensland Government

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oregon Government Ethics Commission in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queensland Government in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Oregon Government Ethics Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oregon Government Ethics Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Queensland Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queensland Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Queensland Government

Queensland Government

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission company and Queensland Government company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission and Queensland Government, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission and Queensland Government, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Oregon Government Ethics Commission or Queensland Government ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Oregon Government Ethics Commission or Queensland Government ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission and Queensland Government, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Oregon Government Ethics Commission and Queensland Government, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86150
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. Impacted is an unknown function of the file custom-x/softap/hostapd. Such manipulation of the argument wpa_passphrase leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86149
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Net/NetCheckPing.cpp. This manipulation of the argument interface_name/host causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86148
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This vulnerability affects the function SystemAsh of the file Apis/system.c of the component Kylin. The manipulation of the argument AlarmVoiceURL results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86206
SUMMARY

A vulnerability in the N-central internal API access control filter allows unauthorised access to internal APIs. This is fixed in N-central 2026.3 HF3 and 2026.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86060
SUMMARY

RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA