Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Orefice & Caliri, CPAs » ISRORE1772829825

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ISRORE1772829825)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-17
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident736 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERISRORE1772829825
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORSMS Phishing
DATA EXPOSEDGPS location, SMS messages, contacts,...
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Orefice & Caliri, CPAs's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Orefice & Caliri, CPAs Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Orefice & Caliri, CPAs breach identified under incident ID ISRORE1772829825.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Orefice & Caliri, CPAs's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orefice-&-caliri-cpas, the number of followers: 41, the industry type: Accounting and the number of employees: 6 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 736 with a difference of -17 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Orefice & Caliri, CPAs and their customers.

On 01 March 2024, Israeli citizens disclosed Cyberespionage issues under the banner "Hamas-Linked Spyware Targets Israelis via Fake Emergency-Alert App".

Security researchers at Acronis Threat Research Unit (TRU) uncovered a cyberespionage campaign distributing spyware disguised as Israel’s official *Red Alert* rocket warning app.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Android devices, and exposing GPS location, SMS messages, contacts, device accounts, credentials, one-time passwords.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Warnings issued by Israel’s National Cyber Directorate and major news outlets.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident highlights the growing role of cyber operations as a parallel intelligence-gathering tool in geopolitical conflicts, and the use of emergency alerts as social engineering lures, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Warnings issued by Israel’s National Cyber Directorate.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sMS phishing messages impersonating the *Oref Alert* service and User Execution: Malicious Link (T1204.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating urging recipients to install a malicious update via a shortened bit.ly link. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating malware disguised as Israel’s official *Red Alert* rocket warning app. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (T1547.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating maintaining persistence through device reboots. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Subvert Trust Controls: SIP and Trust Provider Hijacking (T1553.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating bypasses Android security by spoofing Google Play certificates and Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion (T1497.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malware attributed to Arid Viper, known for evasion techniques. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process: Domain Controller Authentication (T1556.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating phishing overlays to intercept credentials and one-time passwords and Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating intercept credentials and one-time passwords. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Screen Capture (T1113) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating spyware requests 20 permissions, including access to GPS location and Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating access to GPS location, SMS messages, contacts, and device accounts. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data is transmitted to a remote command-and-control server. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data is transmitted to a remote command-and-control server. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Phishing for Information: Spearphishing Link (T1598.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sMS phishing messages impersonating emergency alerts. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References