Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Orange PolskaOrange Polska
VS
PT. Indosat TbkPT. Indosat Tbk
Orange Polska

Orange Polska

Aleje Jerozolimskie 160, Warszawa, 02-326, PL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.orange.pl
771/1000Fair

Orange Polska is the principal supplier of telecommunications services in Poland. Orange Polska provides services, including fixed-line voice telecommunications, voice mail, fixed access to the Internet and Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”). Orange Polska prov...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:4,718
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT. Indosat Tbk

PT. Indosat Tbk

Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 21 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, 10110, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ioh.co.id
768/1000Fair

Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison (IDX: ISAT) ("IOH"), are here with our vision to become the most preferred digital telecommunications company of Indonesia. The IOH merger combines two highly complementary businesses between PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat Ooredoo”) and PT Hutchison ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:12,844
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Orange Polska

Orange Polska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT. Indosat Tbk

PT. Indosat Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange Polska in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT. Indosat Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Orange Polska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange Polska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT. Indosat Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT. Indosat Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Orange Polska

Orange Polska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT. Indosat Tbk

PT. Indosat Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Orange Polska company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Orange Polska and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Orange Polska and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Orange Polska or PT. Indosat Tbk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Orange Polska or PT. Indosat Tbk ?
Between Orange Polska and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Orange Polska and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9