Comparison Overview
Oracle Health

Oracle Health
2300 Oracle Way, Austin, 78741, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Oracle Health strives to connect providers, patients, and public health and life sciences organizations by leveraging the power of data. We aim to create a human-centered healthcare experience for patients—and help physicians reclaim the joy of medicine. For more than ...

Engineering Group
Piazzale dell'agricoltura, 24, Roma, Lazio, IT, 00144
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Engineering Group is the Digital Transformation Company, leader in Italy and expanding its global footprint, with around 14,000 associates and with over 80 offices spread across Europe, the United States, and South America and global delivery. The Engineering Group, c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Oracle Health







Engineering Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Oracle Health in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Engineering Group in 2026.
Incident History - Oracle Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Oracle Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Engineering Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Engineering Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Oracle Health

Engineering Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.