Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Optica 2000Optica 2000
VS
Grupo Casas BahiaGrupo Casas Bahia
Optica 2000

Optica 2000

Carrer de Numància, 46, Barcelona, Catalonia, ES, 08029

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.optica2000.com/
769/1000Fair

Optica2000 forma parte de EssilorLuxottica, líder mundial en el diseño, fabricación y distribución de lentes oftálmicas, monturas y gafas de sol👓 Nuestra misión es empoderar a las personas a través de su punto de vista. Tenemos más de 100 ópticas repartidas por toda ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:154
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Casas Bahia

Grupo Casas Bahia

Rua Flórida 1970, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04575-030

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
817/1000Good

Mais do que varejo, somos um ecossistema que conecta produtos, serviços, crédito e logística com dedicação total! Estamos presentes na mente, no coração e na casa de milhões de brasileiros, com um portfólio de marcas que há décadas faz parte da vida das pessoas: Casas...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:23,214
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Optica 2000

Optica 2000

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Casas Bahia

Grupo Casas Bahia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Optica 2000 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Casas Bahia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Optica 2000 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Optica 2000 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Casas Bahia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Casas Bahia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Optica 2000

Optica 2000

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Casas Bahia

Grupo Casas Bahia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Optica 2000 company and Grupo Casas Bahia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Optica 2000 and Grupo Casas Bahia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Optica 2000 and Grupo Casas Bahia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Optica 2000 or Grupo Casas Bahia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Optica 2000 or Grupo Casas Bahia ?
Between Optica 2000 and Grupo Casas Bahia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Optica 2000 and Grupo Casas Bahia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3