Comparison Overview

OPPO

VS

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

OPPO

China Resources Tower, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518000
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oppo.com/en

Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. To forward our vision of a better future, OPPO has established ten smart manufacturing facilities around the world, as well as a global design center in London. Every day, our 40,000 employees put their heart and soul into exploring the possibilities of humanistic technology. OPPO is not just a device maker. We are a technology company that combines hardware with software and services. Our software range, built around the ColorOS operating system, makes devices more user-friendly and intelligent for our 500 million users worldwide. The OPPO App Market, OPPO Cloud also deliver smarter, more convenient, and better-connected services. Moving forward, OPPO will remain committed to our mission of "Technology for Mankind, Kindness for the World." We will continue to pursue innovation in the smart themes of learning, productivity, entertainment, and healthcare to meet the needs of people around the world. Constantly seeking technological breakthroughs. Make your moment with OPPO.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 52,214
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Avenida Eng. Luís Carlos Berrini, 1376, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04571 - 000
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vivo.com.br

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of products, combining fixed, mobile and digital services. Our purpose is “Digitalize to Bring Closer”, helping to build a digital nation and transforming the life of our customers. More and more, we connect people and things with Fiber, 4G and 4.5G and cover more cities with the network quality that only Vivo has. Today, we cover around 90% of the population with 4G and are accelerating the launch of cities with 4.5G, using carrier aggregation technology. In the fixed operation, we ended 2019 with 21 million homes-passed (HPs) with fiber optic technology, of which 11 million HPs with FTTH (fiber to the home). In addition, all cities with FTTH technology also offer TV over fiber (IPTV), aiming to offer the best speed and experience to our consumers. At Vivo, we also do more than just telecommunications. Within the Group, we have the Telefônica Vivo Foundation, that is committed to making education a priority, developing projects that are based on human potential and use technology as an instrument in favor of inclusion and digital culture.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 37,866
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oppo.jpeg
OPPO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivo-telefonicabr.jpeg
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OPPO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

OPPO has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2025.

Incident History — OPPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oppo.jpeg
OPPO
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Adjacent network access
Motivation: Unauthorized information disclosure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivo-telefonicabr.jpeg
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Internal Jira development and ticketing server
Motivation: Ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

OPPO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

OPPO and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) and OPPO have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while OPPO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company nor OPPO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company nor OPPO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

OPPO company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OPPO company.

OPPO company employs more people globally than Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OPPO nor Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References