Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Opleiding.nl ZakelijkOpleiding.nl Zakelijk
VS
GEMS EducationGEMS Education
Opleiding.nl Zakelijk

Opleiding.nl Zakelijk

Marathon 7, Hilversum, 1213PD, NL

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

Bij Opleiding.nl Zakelijk geloven we in de kracht van kennisdeling. Als opleidingsintermediair zijn wij jouw kennispartner op het gebied van leren en ontwikkelen. Via onze Linkedin pagina delen we dan ook de laatste inzichten, trends en nieuws op het gebied van Learning...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GEMS Education

GEMS Education

GEMS Education Building, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, AE

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
787/1000Fair

GEMS Education is one of the world’s leading private K-12 education providers, educating over 200,000 students from 176+ nationalities across its global network of owned and managed schools. With nearly half a million alumni, GEMS has built a legacy of impact that spans...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:15,878
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Opleiding.nl Zakelijk

Opleiding.nl Zakelijk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GEMS Education

GEMS Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Opleiding.nl Zakelijk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEMS Education in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Opleiding.nl Zakelijk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Opleiding.nl Zakelijk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GEMS Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEMS Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Opleiding.nl Zakelijk

Opleiding.nl Zakelijk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GEMS Education

GEMS Education

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GEM23267522

FAQ

Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk company and GEMS Education company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk and GEMS Education, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk and GEMS Education, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Opleiding.nl Zakelijk or GEMS Education ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Opleiding.nl Zakelijk or GEMS Education ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk and GEMS Education, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Opleiding.nl Zakelijk and GEMS Education, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3