Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OPETOPET
VS
TechnipFMCTechnipFMC
OPET

OPET

Gelincik Sokak, Barbaros, 34746, TR

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.opet.com.tr
755/1000Fair

OPET Petrolcülük A.Ş. is operating in the fields of retail sales, commercial and industrial fuels, mineral oils, storage and international trade. Approximately 1600 stations under the brand of OPET & SUNPET. With its strong infrastructure, realistic vision and its confi...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:2,507
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

Hadrian House, Wincomblee Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 3PL, GB

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://technipfmc.com
795/1000Fair

TechnipFMC is a leading technology provider to the traditional and new energies industry, delivering fully integrated projects, products, and services. With our proprietary technologies and comprehensive solutions, we are transforming our clients’ project economics, h...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:38,099
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OPET

OPET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPET in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnipFMC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OPET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TechnipFMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnipFMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OPET

OPET

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OPET company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OPET and TechnipFMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OPET and TechnipFMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OPET or TechnipFMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OPET or TechnipFMC ?
Between OPET and TechnipFMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OPET and TechnipFMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3