Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Open Reply Benelux - FranceOpen Reply Benelux - France
VS
Publicis SapientPublicis Sapient
Open Reply Benelux - France

Open Reply Benelux - France

Rue du Congrès - Congresstraat 5, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reply.com
751/1000Fair

Reply is an international organisation of over 6000 employees whose combined capabilities and track record, working for financial sector companies (e.g., ABN AMRO, Barclays, Banque Internationale à Luxembourg, BNP Paribas, Delta Lloyd, Deutsche Bank, Euroclear, KBC, RBS...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Publicis Sapient

Publicis Sapient

40 Water St, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02109

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://publicissapient.com/
797/1000Fair

Publicis Sapient is a technology company that provides enterprise AI platforms and services. With over 30 years of digital business transformation experience, we enable enterprise clients to transform how they operate and serve their customers, unlocking new value and e...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:25,723
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Open Reply Benelux - France

Open Reply Benelux - France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Publicis Sapient

Publicis Sapient

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Open Reply Benelux - France in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Publicis Sapient has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Open Reply Benelux - France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Open Reply Benelux - France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Publicis Sapient (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Publicis Sapient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Open Reply Benelux - France

Open Reply Benelux - France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Publicis Sapient

Publicis Sapient

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRE1777710220

FAQ

Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France company and Publicis Sapient company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France and Publicis Sapient, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France and Publicis Sapient, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Open Reply Benelux - France or Publicis Sapient ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Open Reply Benelux - France or Publicis Sapient ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France and Publicis Sapient, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Open Reply Benelux - France and Publicis Sapient, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2