Comparison Overview

OnTrac

VS

Lineage

OnTrac

14850 Thompson Rd, Chantilly, Virginia, US, 20151
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 700 and 749

OnTrac is the solution of choice for last-mile e-commerce deliveries that helps retailers and shippers build a competitive advantage through faster delivery times, lower costs, coast-to-coast coverage, and reliable on-time performance. OnTrac’s footprint stretches across the United States to reach approximately 70% of the population in 35 states and Washington, D.C. and enhance retailers’ ability to meet growing demand in the consumer e-commerce delivery market. OnTrac has evolved into a critical part of the e-commerce infrastructure and is trusted by leading retailers and shippers that desire reduced transit times and increased flexibility within their supply chains.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 5,355
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Lineage

46500 Humboldt Dr., Novi, 48377, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

Lineage is one of the world’s leading temperature-controlled industrial REITs and integrated solutions providers with a global network of over 480 strategically located facilities, totaling nearly 2.9 billion cubic feet of capacity across countries in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Coupling industry-leading expertise in end-to-end logistical solutions and innovative technology, Lineage partners with the world’s largest food and beverage companies to increase distribution efficiency, advance sustainability, minimize supply chain waste, and, most importantly, help feed the world. In recognition of the company’s leading innovations and sustainability initiatives, Lineage has been named a CNBC Disruptor 50 Company for three consecutive years, twice named a US Best Managed Company, named the No. 1 Data Science company, and 23rd overall, on Fast Company’s list of The World’s Most Innovative Companies, and was included on Fortune’s Change the World list. Nasdaq: LINE

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 10,612
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ontrac-shipping.jpeg
OnTrac
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onelineage.jpeg
Lineage
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OnTrac
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lineage
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

OnTrac has 16.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lineage in 2025.

Incident History — OnTrac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OnTrac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lineage (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lineage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ontrac-shipping.jpeg
OnTrac
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onelineage.jpeg
Lineage
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lineage company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OnTrac company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

OnTrac company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lineage company has not reported any.

In the current year, OnTrac company has reported more cyber incidents than Lineage company.

Neither Lineage company nor OnTrac company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

OnTrac company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lineage company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lineage company nor OnTrac company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OnTrac company nor Lineage company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OnTrac company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lineage company.

Lineage company employs more people globally than OnTrac company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OnTrac nor Lineage holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N