Comparison Overview

OnTrac

VS

A.P. Moller - Maersk

OnTrac

14850 Thompson Rd, Chantilly, Virginia, US, 20151
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.ontrac.com

OnTrac is the solution of choice for last-mile e-commerce deliveries that helps retailers and shippers build a competitive advantage through faster delivery times, lower costs, coast-to-coast coverage, and reliable on-time performance. OnTrac’s footprint stretches across the United States to reach approximately 70% of the population in 35 states and Washington, D.C. and enhance retailers’ ability to meet growing demand in the consumer e-commerce delivery market. OnTrac has evolved into a critical part of the e-commerce infrastructure and is trusted by leading retailers and shippers that desire reduced transit times and increased flexibility within their supply chains.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 5,355
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Esplanaden 50, None, Copenhagen, None, DK, 1098
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849
http://www.maersk.com

A.P. Moller - Maersk is an integrated transport and logistics company; going all the way, together, for our customers and society. ALL THE WAY is our commitment to connect the world so that everyone has both the possibility and the ability to trade, grow and thrive. The company employs roughly 110.000 employees across operations in 130 countries.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 79,448
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ontrac-shipping.jpeg
OnTrac
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maersk-group.jpeg
A.P. Moller - Maersk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OnTrac
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A.P. Moller - Maersk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

OnTrac has 16.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.P. Moller - Maersk in 2025.

Incident History — OnTrac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OnTrac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A.P. Moller - Maersk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.P. Moller - Maersk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ontrac-shipping.jpeg
OnTrac
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maersk-group.jpeg
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Updates (NotPetya via Ukrainian accounting software), Phishing/Social Engineering, Outdated/Poorly Maintained Systems, Third-Party Vendor Vulnerabilities, GNSS Jamming/Spoofing (Russia, Iran, China), AI-Assisted Exploits (e.g., subverting AI assistants), Manual Override of Digital Systems (human error)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware), Geopolitical Disruption (State Actors), Espionage (Strategic Maritime Data), Hacktivism (e.g., Lab-Dookhtegan), Operational Sabotage (e.g., GNSS Interference)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

A.P. Moller - Maersk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OnTrac company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

OnTrac and A.P. Moller - Maersk have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, OnTrac company has reported more cyber incidents than A.P. Moller - Maersk company.

Neither A.P. Moller - Maersk company nor OnTrac company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

OnTrac company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other A.P. Moller - Maersk company has not reported such incidents publicly.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while OnTrac company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OnTrac company nor A.P. Moller - Maersk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OnTrac company.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company employs more people globally than OnTrac company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OnTrac nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References